Talk:Zazas
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zazas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Edit Request: Selfidentification
[edit]Good evening, I would like to ask you to change the points of self-identification, as most Zazas see themselves as a separate ethnic group. I am attaching the Tesav survey.
The total figures here show that 90% of the Zazas see themselves as a separate ethnic group. The "Kurdification" of the Zaza people is merely political. "According to a 2015 study that examined the demographics of the voting-age population in the Kurdish inhabited areas in Turkey (Northeast, Central East and Southeast Anatolia statistical regions, n=1918) 12.8% of the people ethnically identified as Zaza, which made Zaza the biggest ethnic identity after Kurdish (73%) in the region. Zaza speakers were more numerous (15%) compared to people who identify with the Zaza ethnic identity, showing that some Zaza speakers identified as other ethnicities, primarily Kurds" It is a survey made by TESAV. source: https://www.yada.org.tr/kurt-secmenlerin-oy-verme-dinamikleri-kuzeydogu-ortadogu-ve-guneydogu-anadolu-alt-bolgelerinde-secmenlerin-siyasal-tercihlerinin-sosyolojik-analizi/ Martinbreu.89 (talk) 22:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The methodology of certain surveys has been criticized for being unfair. For example, a survey might ask respondents whether they consider themselves Kurds or Zazas, rather than using the more specific distinction of Kurmanj or Zaza. This approach has been perceived as part of a broader effort by Turkish authorities to create a separation between Kurdish identities. As a result, many Zazas find themselves confused by these categorizations. It is noteworthy that many Zazas continue to identify as Kurds, particularly since Kurdish political parties have gained significant support in numerous Zaza-majority villages. Additionally, there are many Zazas who also identify as Turkish. This complex interplay of identities has led to a broader discussion about how these identities are represented and understood in various surveys and studies. Sikorki (talk) 17:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Turkish Version
[edit]The Turkish version of this article is problematic and should be translated from the English version immediately. Turkish Version Sikorki (talk) 12:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)